The Fate of the House of Peace
SUMMARY OF EVENTS:
The Jerusalem District Court ruled on 13
September 2012, that the locally-known “House of Peace”, a privately owned,
Palestinian building in Hebron’s H2 area, belonging to the Al Rajabi family is
to be given to Israeli settlers.
The house is situated in a valley at the
southern entrance of the Kiryat Arba settlement, in a strategic location that
could link this settlement to five other nearby settlements around Hebron’s Old
City.
The Al Rajabi family is currently
preparing to file an appeal to the court ruling. Nonetheless, they are not
hopeful of the outcome and are seeking international support to pressure Israel
to return their property to them without delay.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
On 19 March 2007, approximately 200 settlers
occupied the building and claimed to have purchased it. The settlers launched a
campaign of attacks against Palestinian families and their property in an
effort to pressure Palestinians to move away from the area. Their efforts were
supplemented by an increased presence of Israeli soldiers in the area to
provide security for the settlers, which resulted in severe movement and access
restrictions for Palestinians.
On 17 November 2008, the Israeli Supreme
Court ruled that the ownership deed produced by the settlers was forged, and
declared that the ownership of the building should only be decided after the
case has gone through all levels of litigation in the Israeli Judicial system.
The settlers were ordered to vacate the building, which they did, while
injuring approximately 25 Palestinian civilians, damaging seven cars, and
vandalizing three homes in the process.
Since then, the Israeli Military has
occupied the building pending a court decision, and the area has been calm.
However, the Jerusalem District Court’s ruling will likely result in increased
settler violence and harassment targeting Palestinians living in the area.
INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW:
Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva
Convention of 1949 states that, “The Occupying Power shall not deport or
transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.”
Article 23 of The Hague Convention of
1907 clearly states that, “it is especially forbidden (for the occupier) to
destroy or seize the enemy's property, unless such destruction or seizure be
imperatively demanded by the necessities of war."
You may either use the sample letter
below or draft your own:
Mr. Ambassador / Consul General /
Defense Minister / Judge Advocate General, Chief of Staff,
I am writing you in light of a recent
decision by the Jerusalem District Court on 13 September 2012, which ruled that
ownership of the so-called “House of Peace” in the West Bank City of Hebron be
transferred to Israeli settlers.
The situation in the City of Hebron is
already tense and the handing over of the building to settlers would only serve
to increase the tension in the area, and will endanger the lives and property
of Palestinians living in the area, threatening the relative peace and
stability that has been upheld since the removal of settlers from the building
by the Israeli military in 2008.
Moreover, the Jerusalem District Court’s
decision contradicts Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949, which
states that; “The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own
civilian population into the territory it occupies.”
The ruling is also a violation of
Article 23 of The Hague Convention of 1907 clearly states that, “it is
especially forbidden (for the occupier) to destroy or seize the enemy's
property, unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively demanded by the
necessities of war."
Sincerely,
YOUR
NAME/ORGANIZATION



Comments
Post a Comment